|
|
 |
 |
 |
January 11,
2002 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Stated
simply, the "digital divide" is the gap between the technology haves
and have-nots. As a teacher, you don't have to look far to see signs
of the digital divide. There are students in your classes who have
Internet access at home. And there are students who don't even have
computers at home. Perhaps your school has Internet access in every
classroom. And the school in the next town only has Internet access
in the library.
There are other inequities — times and
places where things are not equal and fair — in Internet and
technology access that can also be viewed as part of "the digital
divide." Rural households are less likely to have Internet access
than suburban households. Blacks and Hispanics are less likely to
have Internet access than Whites and Asian Americans. The young are
haves; the old and disabled are have-nots.
Why is it so important to recognize and address the digital
divide? In our better moments, we all feel that the United States
should not be a country of social injustice and that every man or
woman, no matter his or her race, age, background, religion, ability
or disability, should have the same opportunities. But nearly 65% of
college graduates have home Internet access, while less than 12% of
households headed by someone with less than a high school education
have Internet access. 86.3% of households earning $75,000 and above
each year had Internet access in late 2000 compared to only 12.7% of
households earning less than $15,000 per year. Those that have the
technology — both physical access to it and the exposure and
training to know how to use it — can use the technology to make more
money, buy more or better technology, etc.
Over 60% of today's jobs require technology skills. Lack of
access to the tools of today's workplaces leads those without the
technology to be stuck in place, to never be able to make enough
money to afford the technology and training that would make
employment in areas requiring the use of technology even possible.
Learn
About the Problem In order to read and evaluate a report like
Falling Through the Net: Toward Digital Inclusion that
presents so much data in a variety of forms, it is important that
your students understand ratios and percents, and that they know how
to read and evaluate different types of graphs. The following
Destination Math tutorials can help prepare your students to
evaluate the report:
For numerical data presented in tables, you may want your
students to think about how the above visual tools for presenting
data (e.g. bar graph, pie chart, etc.) are used to more effectively
present specific information from the
report.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |

|
 |
 |
Think About the
Problem This section presents
questions to help your students think about the data taken from the
latest report:
- The share of households with Internet
access rose by 58% from December 1998 to August 2000. If the share
of households with Internet access was 26.2% in December 1998,
what was the share in August 2000?
- There were 116.5 million Americans
online — either at home, at work, at school, or in a local library
or community center — in August 2000. That is 31.9 million more
Americans online than in December 1998. How much of an increase
was that stated as a percent? How many more people would be online
since August 2000 if there were only a 1% new growth in
use?
- While both numbers above show an
increase, the percent increase in individual Americans online is
less than the share increase of users with Internet access in
their homes. List several reasons why these two statistics do not
need to match. Also think about how percentages work on smaller
versus larger numbers. Take an arbitrary 10 lions and 25 tigers.
How big of a percent increase is needed to get to 50 lions and 50
tigers? The lions need a 400% increase, but the tigers only need a
100% increase.
- The gap in Internet access is
narrowing between urban and suburban households and those in rural
areas. Rural areas have trailed the nationwide Internet
penetration rate (see problem #1 above). In August 2000, 38.9% of
rural households had Internet access. That number was 22.2% in
December 1998. What was the percent increase in rural Internet
access?
- Refer to this bar graph, which shows data from August 2000.
In December 1998, there was a gap in Internet usage between men
and women. That gap has now disappeared for the overall U.S.
population. However, the data shows gender gaps among Asian
Americans, Blacks, and Hispanics. Describe what you see in the
data.
- The digital divide in Internet use as
viewed by race/ethnicity is a story of good news/bad news. The
good news is that Black and Hispanic households have made
substantial gains. Black households were more than twice as likely
to have home access in August 2000 than in December 1998. Hispanic
households also saw huge growth in access, rising from 12.6% to
23.6%. However, there is bad news. Summarize the gaps you can see
in the bar graph. The gap in Internet access between
Black households and the national average was 15 percentage points
in December 1998. What is it now? The gap also widened for
Hispanic households compared with the national
average.
- Use this pie chart to answer the following questions. For
U.S. households that already own a computer, what are the top
three reasons given for never accessing the Internet?
Surprisingly, the "don't want it" category increased 5 percentage
points from December 1998 to August 2000.
|
 |
 |
 |

|
 |
 |
Extending the Problem
- People who don't use the Internet
often don't know what people who do use the Internet use it for!
Take a look at this chart of Daily Internet Activities taken from a recent
report from the Pew Internet & American Live Project. How many
of these activities do you do on the Internet? For a more detailed
report on what it's like for today's teens online, read Teenage Life Online: The rise of the instant-message
generation.
- The digital divide is being recognized and, with enough
effort, solved in many communities around the United States. East Palo Alto is a poor community in the heart of
California's Silicon Valley. Read how corporate donations have
place computers in classrooms where kids had never used computers
before. Pittsburgh has been addressing both the physical
lack of modern or even working technology as well as a lack of
staff training in how to use or maintain computers. Boston has made great progress in pushing equity
in technology as part of the city's education reform movement.
Read about the successful Digital Bridges and TechBoston
projects.
- To some, "throwing computers at the problem" is not the
solution — or not the complete solution — to the digital divide.
Read other interesting perspectives in "Digital
Deconstruction" by MSNBC.com's Brock Meeks and "Solve the Digital Divide by Closing the Power
Divide," a talk at the Wireless Vision Congress by Mark Lloyd.
|

 |
|
 |
 |
Data
Displays An
introduction to Tangible Math's Stats! tools for creating bar
graphs, pie charts, etc. |
 |
 |
 |
Computers
for Africa Read how
two people have helped bridge South Africa's digital
divide. |
 |
 |
 |
The
Net Generation This
Riverdeep Current archive article looks at other issues of
global tech equity. |
 | |
 |
 |
 |
|
 | |